The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 20.0516 Friday, 16 October 2009
[1] From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 15 Oct 2009 13:55:14 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 20.0512 English Language Day
[2] From: John W Kennedy <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 15 Oct 2009 19:55:44 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 20.0512 English Language Day
[3] From: John E. Perry <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 15 Oct 2009 22:41:06 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 20.0512 English Language Day
[4] From: Robert Projansky <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Friday, 16 Oct 2009 00:32:52 -0700
Subj: Re: SHK 20.0512 English Language Day
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Larry Weiss <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 15 Oct 2009 13:55:14 -0400
Subject: 20.0512 English Language Day
Comment: Re: SHK 20.0512 English Language Day
Bad as "that's" is, it doesn't hold a candle to a banner someone told me
she saw: JESUS SAVE'S. "Save us" maybe?
[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: John W Kennedy <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
>
Date: Thursday, 15 Oct 2009 19:55:44 -0400
Subject: 20.0512 English Language Day
Comment: Re: SHK 20.0512 English Language Day
Nancy Charlton <
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
> wrote:
>"That's"? A genitive ('possessive' to the Latin-challenged) of "that"?
>Has such a barbarity taken hold as accepted usage, or am I missing
>something?
Hardly a barbarism (or a barbarity for that matter), as I suppose it
could be justified by OE "
|
