2010

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 21.0111  Thursday, 11 March 2010

From:         David Bishop <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:         March 7, 2010 3:01:53 PM EST
Subject: 21.0101 Query: Gloucester's [Cornwall's] Servant
Comment:      Re: SHK 21.0101 Query: Gloucester's [Cornwall's] Servant

The servant's being Cornwall's son would be an important piece of information, which Shakespeare would not introduce with one passing word. To understand the meaning of "bred" here a better analogy would be with horses or dogs.

Cornwall is very high royalty. He would not make his son his servant.

Finally, the rebellion of this lifelong servant against Cornwall is an awesome transgression, which emphasizes the corresponding horror of Cornwall's outrage to morality. Making the servant his son, even if it were possible, would detract from this emphasis.

Best wishes,
David Bishop

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.

 

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Donation

Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER.