| Thomas of Woodstock |
|
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 22.0301 Tuesday, 15 November 2011
From: Michael Egan < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it > Date: November 15, 2011 12:33:57 AM EST Subject: Re: SHAKSPER: Thomas of Woodstock
Al Magary < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it > wrote,
>>Michael Egan wrote, in passing: >> >>I have promises to keep, among them a new Complete >>Shakespeare—for the first time, really complete, with >>the likeliest "apocryphal" plays printed alongside their >>First Folio counterparts, e.g. The Taming of a Shrew >>and The Taming of the Shrew, The Troublesome Reign >>and King John, etc. >> >>BTW, I am looking for Introducers/Editors, so if any readers >>would like to offer their talents I'll be glad to receive them. >>You may propose one play or a group of plays. > >Come one! come all! Enter the GREAT SHAKESPEARE >BONANZA right here! Anyone can enter! 25 cents admission, >bring whoever you want—and young'uns free! See the >FEEJEE MERMAID—head of a monkey, tail of a fish! >Witness the CARDIFF GIANT rise up before you! See >the AMAZING EXPANDING SHAKESPEARE! Before your >very eyes he will write another famous play—not just one >play, but two, one with each hand! It's magic, it's mystery! >In theater it's whatever you want! Want a BEARDED LADY? >You got it! And--there's more! Free rides in a hot-air balloon, >launched hourly from the roof of SHAKESPEARE'S GRAND >TRAVELING MUSEUM, MENAGERIE, CARAVAN & >HIPPODROME!
I am stunned by Al Magary's childish response to my passing request for editors. Is his suggestion that a collection of Shakespeare plays, together with their early versions, is an unscholarly joke?
In the meantime, while this listserv gives space to mental infants like Magary, try publishing a serious discussion about, shall we say, Anonymous, or a comment that actually has something supportive to say about my thesis that Shakespeare wrote 1 Richard II. In the words of one recent private correspondent:
“I am not allowed on SHAKSPER [...but...] I think your answers have been remarkably cool, calm and correct in spite of the snarling and sniping critics on Shaksper. I can feel the heartfelt love of Shakespeare and confidence you have in your analysis of Thomas of Woodcock. Thanks for your analysis and patience with some of their Shakscribers. I am making every effort reading TOW and from your posts, while studying your analysis. Keep up the good work, Michael.”
I can’t help recalling Atty Joe Welch’s famous remark to Sen Joseph McCarthy, June 9, 1954: “You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?”
Michael Egan |
