The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 22.0303  Wednesday, 16 November 2011

[1] From:         Peter Groves < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

     Date:         November 15, 2011 4:39:21 PM EST

     Subject:      Re: SHAKSPER: Thomas of Woodstock

[2] From:         Chris Kendall < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

     Date:         November 15, 2011 7:10:57 PM EST

     Subject:      Anonymous

[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------

From:         Peter Groves < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

Date:         November 15, 2011 4:39:21 PM EST

Subject:      Re: SHAKSPER: Thomas of Woodstock

I, for one, would like to praise Michael Egan's boldness in proposing "a serious discussion about . . . Anonymous", a film that confuses Richard II with Richard III and represents blank verse as a theatrical innovation of the seventeenth century.

Peter Groves

Monash University

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------

From:         Chris Kendall < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

Date:         November 15, 2011 7:10:57 PM EST

Subject:      Anonymous

Michael Egan writes: "In the meantime, while this listserv gives space to mental infants like Magary, try publishing a serious discussion about, shall we say, Anonymous, or . . . "

From the reviews I've read, I'd venture to say that a serious discussion about Anonymous is not possible.