- Scholarly Resources
- Current Postings
|New in Papers for Comment: Shakespeare and Chess Again|
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 22.0208 Tuesday, 30 August 2011
Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Subject: New in Papers for Comment: Shakespeare and Chess Again
“Shakespeare and Chess Again: A proposal for an alternative reading of pawn(s) in King Lear, King John, and The Winter’s Tale by José Luis Oncins (Universidad de Extremadura) is now available in the Papers for Comment section of the SHAKSPER web site: http://shaksper.net/scholarly-resources/scholarly-papers-for-comments
This essay is shortly to be published in the Journal SEDERI (of the Spanish and Portuguese Society of English Renaissance Studies), and José Luis Oncins would like to receive comments or suggestions before it comes out in Autumn.
For the last three centuries, Shakespeare’s plays have been continuously glossed, commented on and annotated. However, there still remain quite a few obscure passages and complex words which continue to puzzle and cause debate as to their precise meanings. One such word is pawn, glossed as a pun in some editions of King Lear, and passed over in silence in other plays where it appears in similar contexts. This essay proposes an alternative reading of the word in King Lear, King John, and The Winter’s Tale. The hypothesis put forward is that Shakespeare was indeed hinting at the various senses of this word and exploiting its punning potential in these three plays. This suggestion is supported by a series of examples of similar rhetorical exploitation of this polysemic word as found in several contemporary authors. These examples will demonstrate that the various senses of the word were indeed very much alive in Elizabethan England–and quite probably in Shakespeare’s mind.
SHAKSPER: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The SHAKSPER Web Site <http://shaksper.net>
DONATION: Consider making a donation to support SHAKSPER: shaksper.net.
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.