The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 23.0223 Monday, 4 June 2012
Date: June 1, 2012 1:42:51 PM EDT
Subject: Re: SHAKSPER: Peds
> But Larry, what do you think? Was F 2H6 partially influenced
>by Q3 “Contention”?
I don’t know, but the Oxford editors (principally William Montgomery) accepted the hypothesis that certain “close correspondences could have resulted from Q having been used intermittently as copy for F.” Textual Companion at 175. I think that is at least plausible.