The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 23.0223  Monday, 4 June 2012

From:        Larry Weiss < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

Date:         June 1, 2012 1:42:51 PM EDT

Subject:     Re: SHAKSPER: Peds

> But Larry, what do you think? Was F 2H6 partially influenced 

>by Q3 “Contention”?

I don’t know, but the Oxford editors (principally William Montgomery) accepted the hypothesis that certain “close correspondences could have resulted from Q having been used intermittently as copy for F.”  Textual Companion at 175.  I think that is at least plausible.