Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2013 :: May ::
Kent’s Character

 

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 24.0223  Tuesday, 7 May 2013

 

From:        Scot Zarela < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

Date:         May 6, 2013 4:41:44 PM EDT

Subject:     Re: Kent’s Character

 

Jack Heller wonders if Kent’s treatment of Oswald is “appropriate” in II.ii. It depends on a code of ethics we don’t so much hold to anymore. Kent succinctly explains what he finds so objectionable (lines 1139-40):

 

That such a slave as this should wear a sword, 

Who wears no honesty.

 

I don’t believe William Empson covered this particular case of “honesty,” but as used here it’s clearly one of his complex words. Kent’s actions are his explication: he offers insulting words, and then the flat of his sword, to demonstrate that Oswald doesn’t dare use his “edge.” In Oswald’s hands, the sword is for cowing those who are weak, not for meeting those equal in arms: he’s the practical definition of a villain. And there is Kent’s justification. 

 
 

Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.