Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Archive :: 2013 :: July ::
Q: Stylometrics

 

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 24.0342  Tuesday, 16 July 2013

 

From:        Jed Serrano < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

Date:         July 16, 2013 2:27:23 PM EDT

Subject:     Re: SHAKSPER: Stylometrics

 

I read with keen interest Ward Elliot’s stylometrics description and Larry Weiss’s transcript of the opinion against Michael Egan’s attribution of Thomas of Woodstock to Shakespeare—three cheers to the two.

 

As a recent subscriber, I now get the hot-ish air between Weiss and Egan et al.

 

Indeed, stylometrics is as fascinating as it’s new to me, a recent English major degree holder. As far as I can tell, the methodology sounds sound to me. And I probably would have considered it for grad school had I heard of it. That its methodology is fairly replicable potentially gives the humanities, if honest, a cause for consensus. Surely, problems of this anti-humanistic seeming approach for the humanities I reckon have been chewed over many times—traditionalists (anti-stylometrists?) v. non-, as Elliot mentioned; for myself, stylometrics seems like a branch of philology, similar to the methods used to expose The Constantine Donation as a forgery and Ad Herennium as not Cicero’s.     

 

Jed               

 
 

Other Messages In This Thread

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.