The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 24.0543  Tuesday, 3 December 2013


From:        Frank Whigham <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>

Date:         December 3, 2013 at 10:23:57 AM EST

Subject:    Harry Berger


Michael Egan wrote,


>It is not often in these columns that I hear a public supporting 

>voice. Thanks to Gerald Downs for agreeing that the citation 

>is virtually meaningless. I’d like to push the matter one step 

>further: how did we get to this place in Shakespeare criticism 

>where not only does such baloney get written and published 

>but no one notices and even worse no one cares.


>The oh-so-bored Harry Berger, for example


Just curious: is it that bored Berger actually writes baloney or just doesn’t care properly when others do?


~Frank Whigham


Subscribe to Our Feeds


Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.