Subscribe to Our Feeds

Current Postings RSS

Announcements RSS

Home :: Current Postings ::
Dugdale Archive

 

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 23.0342  Monday, 20 August 2012

 

From:        William Proctor Williams < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

Date:         August 18, 2012 12:39:23 PM EDT

Subject:     Dugdale Archive 

 

Very briefly to answer Marcia Eppich-Harris’s question about F1 and copyright, authors did not usually hold copyright for their works in this period.   From the charter granted to the Stationers’ Company by Mary I in 1557 until the first and second copyright acts of Anne in 1708/09, only freemen of the Stationers’ Company or their widows if they did not remarry could print, publish, and hold copyright in works in England.  A very few authors were freemen of the Company and therefore could hold copyright but they did not hold it as authors but as stationers.  Copyright was thought to be perpetual and to be real property and could be sold, transferred, subdivided, inherited, and the like but only amongst freemen of the Company. Authors or those who had control of texts sold them outright to Stationers and that was their only profit from their writing.  Some few had private arrangements with Stationers which might involve some further payment (e.g., Milton with Paradise Lost) but no matter what this might be copyright still had to be held by a freeman of the Company.  Thus, no one in the Shakespeare family, no matter how defined, stood to benefit in any way from F1 because of copyright.

 

William Proctor Williams

 
 

©2011 Hardy Cook. All rights reserved.