Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 5, No. 0140.  Monday, 21 February 1994.
 
(1)     From:   William Godshalk <GODSHAWL@UCBEH>
        Date:   Saturday, 19 Feb 1994 20:32:20 -0500 (EST)
        Subj:   Re: SHK 5.0133  Psycho Macbeth; Parting Shot (Universals)
 
(2)     From:   William Proctor Williams <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Sunday, 20 Feb 94 12:37 CST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 5.0135  The Oxford Editors and *MM*
 
 
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           William Godshalk <GODSHAWL@UCBEH>
Date:           Saturday, 19 Feb 1994 20:32:20 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 5.0133  Psycho Macbeth; Parting Shot (Universals)
Comment:        Re: SHK 5.0133  Psycho Macbeth; Parting Shot (Universals)
 
To Al Cacicedo: Is bullseye a euphemism?
 
Bill Godshalk
 
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:           William Proctor Williams <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Sunday, 20 Feb 94 12:37 CST
Subject: 5.0135  The Oxford Editors and *MM*
Comment:        Re: SHK 5.0135  The Oxford Editors and *MM*
 
I think that no one could believe that I have ever been a supporter of the New
Oxford Shakespeare.  It simply gets too many things wrong.  I am also, by and
large, a supporter of many of the things William Godshalk stands for and
expresses.
 
But, that good old Shakespearean "but", Taylor and Jowett's +Shakespeare
Reshaped+ is a first-rate piece of scholarship and I could no more dimiss it
out of hand than I could W.G.'s article in +SQ+ in 1972.  We need, on this list
and in our profession, much more light and much less heat.  Or so I believe.
 
William Proctor Williams
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.