Shakespeare Electronic Conference, Vol. 5, No. 0140. Monday, 21 February 1994.
(1) From: William Godshalk <GODSHAWL@UCBEH>
Date: Saturday, 19 Feb 1994 20:32:20 -0500 (EST)
Subj: Re: SHK 5.0133 Psycho Macbeth; Parting Shot (Universals)
(2) From: William Proctor Williams <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 20 Feb 94 12:37 CST
Subj: Re: SHK 5.0135 The Oxford Editors and *MM*
(1)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: William Godshalk <GODSHAWL@UCBEH>
Date: Saturday, 19 Feb 1994 20:32:20 -0500 (EST)
Subject: 5.0133 Psycho Macbeth; Parting Shot (Universals)
Comment: Re: SHK 5.0133 Psycho Macbeth; Parting Shot (Universals)
To Al Cacicedo: Is bullseye a euphemism?
Bill Godshalk
(2)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: William Proctor Williams <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 20 Feb 94 12:37 CST
Subject: 5.0135 The Oxford Editors and *MM*
Comment: Re: SHK 5.0135 The Oxford Editors and *MM*
I think that no one could believe that I have ever been a supporter of the New
Oxford Shakespeare. It simply gets too many things wrong. I am also, by and
large, a supporter of many of the things William Godshalk stands for and
expresses.
But, that good old Shakespearean "but", Taylor and Jowett's +Shakespeare
Reshaped+ is a first-rate piece of scholarship and I could no more dimiss it
out of hand than I could W.G.'s article in +SQ+ in 1972. We need, on this list
and in our profession, much more light and much less heat. Or so I believe.
William Proctor Williams
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.