The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.1200 Saturday, 28 November 1998.
[1] From: Carl Fortunato <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Friday, 27 Nov 1998 10:25:06 EST
Subj: Re: SHK 9.1190 Re: Park Honan's Sh.
[2] From: Carl Fortunato <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Friday, 27 Nov 1998 10:27:25 EST
Subj: Re: SHK 9.1196 Re: Pericles
[3] From: Richard A Burt <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Friday, 27 Nov 1998 15:59:48 -0500 (EST)
Subj: PBS Ian Holm Shakespeare
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Carl Fortunato <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Friday, 27 Nov 1998 10:25:06 EST
Subject: 9.1190 Re: Park Honan's Sh.
Comment: Re: SHK 9.1190 Re: Park Honan's Sh.
> From the article below printed in the Saturday Star (Toronto) it seems
> that the book is co-authored with Foster. The Telegraph Report written
> by Honan gave no mention of computerized studies or of Foster. Very
> strange. I hope the article is not too long for this list.
>
> By Steve Fabrar
> SPECIAL TO THE STAR
Dear me! It looks like some scholars are facing the old "publish or
perish" axe again! I almost pity them. Almost.
And they don't think the Ghost in Hamlet or Henry IV require much
dramatic ability, eh? Scholarship most curious, as in the best it is.
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Carl Fortunato <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Friday, 27 Nov 1998 10:27:25 EST
Subject: 9.1196 Re: Pericles
Comment: Re: SHK 9.1196 Re: Pericles
>>I saw a preview of Pericles at the Public Theatre in New York three
>>weeks ago and have been surprised not to see it mentioned on the list
>>though I may have missed references to it. It's an inventive, sensitive,
>>and deeply moving production which I highly recommend, especially to
>>those contributors who referred to it as a bad play.
>I saw the play last evening, and can't agree entirely. While portions
>were sensitive and moving, and the staging can well be characterized as
>"inventive," I much preferred the more naturalistic, albeit
>self-consciously modernized, production of the play which the New York
>Shakespeare Festival did at the Public a few years ago.
May I ask, please, where this is playing?
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Richard A Burt <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Friday, 27 Nov 1998 15:59:48 -0500 (EST)
Subject: PBS Ian Holm Shakespeare
I saw the Ian Holms Lear for $29.95 at the Boston Borders Books.