The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.1200  Saturday, 28 November 1998.

[1]     From:   Carl Fortunato <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 27 Nov 1998 10:25:06 EST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 9.1190 Re: Park Honan's Sh.

[2]     From:   Carl Fortunato <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 27 Nov 1998 10:27:25 EST
        Subj:   Re: SHK 9.1196 Re: Pericles

[3]     From:   Richard A Burt <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
        Date:   Friday, 27 Nov 1998 15:59:48 -0500 (EST)
        Subj:   PBS Ian Holm Shakespeare


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Carl Fortunato <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 27 Nov 1998 10:25:06 EST
Subject: 9.1190 Re: Park Honan's Sh.
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.1190 Re: Park Honan's Sh.

>  From the article below printed in the Saturday Star (Toronto) it seems
>  that the book is co-authored with Foster. The Telegraph Report written
>  by Honan gave no mention of computerized studies or of Foster.  Very
>  strange. I hope the article is not too long for this list.
>
>                     By Steve Fabrar
>                     SPECIAL TO THE STAR

Dear me!  It looks like some scholars are facing the old "publish or
perish" axe again!  I almost pity them.  Almost.

And they don't think the Ghost in Hamlet or Henry IV require much
dramatic ability, eh?  Scholarship most curious, as in the best it is.

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Carl Fortunato <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 27 Nov 1998 10:27:25 EST
Subject: 9.1196 Re: Pericles
Comment:        Re: SHK 9.1196 Re: Pericles

>>I saw a preview of Pericles at the Public Theatre in New York three
>>weeks ago and have been surprised not to see it mentioned on the list
>>though I may have missed references to it. It's an inventive, sensitive,
>>and deeply moving production which I highly recommend, especially to
>>those contributors who referred to it as a bad play.

>I saw the play last evening, and can't agree entirely.  While portions
>were sensitive and moving, and the staging can well be characterized as
>"inventive," I much preferred the more naturalistic, albeit
>self-consciously modernized, production of the play which the New York
>Shakespeare Festival did at the Public a few years ago.

May I ask, please, where this is playing?

[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Richard A Burt <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Friday, 27 Nov 1998 15:59:48 -0500 (EST)
Subject:        PBS Ian Holm Shakespeare

I saw the Ian Holms Lear for $29.95 at the Boston Borders Books.

Subscribe to Our Feeds

Search

Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.