The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 10.1096  Wednesday, 30 June 1999.

From:           C. David Frankel <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Tuesday, 29 Jun 1999 19:23:58 -0400
Subject:        Julius Caesar Query

Louis Marder listed this point in his reply to Harpers':

There is not one atom of evidence to prove Oxford was lame after his
duel with Thomas Knyvet linking him with Shakespeare's presumed
lameness, which is merely a figure of speech in the sonnets. Even if
both were lame, it would not positively mean that they were one and the
same person.

I'm curious about Shakespeare's lameness-is this a widely accepted
presumption?  and if so, on what evidence.  One of the reason's I'm
interested is that in Julius Caesar, I, iii, Casca says: "BM_136Stand
close awhile, for here comes one in haste," to which Cassius replies, "
'Tis Cinna; I do know him by his gait
<http://www-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/Gloss/gloss.G.html#GAIT> ;/BM_138He
is a friend
<http://www-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/Gloss/gloss.F.html#FRIEND> ." I
have speculated that this line indicates that Cinna walks with a limp
and that, perhaps, the actor did as well (although the limp could be
purely theatrical).  I know that Shakespeare is sometimes said to have
played Caesar, but is there any evidence or hearsay to suggest that he
might have played Cinna the Conspirator?


Subscribe to Our Feeds


Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.