The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1338 Saturday, 18 May 2002
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2002 06:28:05 +1000 (EST)
Subject: 13.1325 Re: Accents
Comment: RE: SHK 13.1325 Re: Accents
> I do wonder quite what we are trying to prove in this thread. To take
> one example that has been offered as some sort of test case:
> > > Disconsolate friends of Bill and Elaine
> > > w s w s w s w s w s
> This is not an 'iambic pentameter' because it is unambiguously a
> four-beat line, and its dominant pattern is X// (or 'dactylic' if you
> It's not 'unmetrical'; or at least it's only 'unmetrical' in a context
> of expectation where it is either assumed that ten syllables 'ought' to
> be iambic pentameter, or where it is surrounded by lines that are
> five-beat lines with a norm of alternating stress and unstress. It
> would be easy to imagine it as a perfectly 'metrical' line in another
> Professor David Lindley
> Head, School of English
Sorry, I must have been unclear. I'm using "unmetrical" in a relative
and perhaps technical sense, not in some absolute sense. Given that we
were talking about i.p., I used it to mean "ruled out as a possible i.p.
because of its prosodic structure", a judgment you appear to agree with.
A classicist from Adelaide once complained that the motto of my
university, "ancora imparo", was "ungrammatical", meaning "ungrammatical
Latin"; he was right, of course, but he overlooked the fact that it was
perfectly grammatical Italian ("I'm still learning"). I shall try to
dot mu "i"s and cross my "t"s in future.
Dr Peter Groves
Left Big Toe, Department of English
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.