The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1782  Thursday, 15 August 2002

From:           Marcus Dahl <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Wednesday, 14 Aug 2002 06:27:12 EDT
Subject:        Re: Stationer's Register

Dear All,

I refer to a previous correspondence (below) on the SHAKSPER with John
Briggs re: the SR. I wonder if anyone would be able to explain *why*
there are two peaks in SR entries between 1594-5 and 1600-1? I remember
John Briggs seemed to think I was wrong to think that a preponderance of
history plays entered around this time was significant. Apparently the
explanation is that some publishers randomly thought it was a good idea
to publish plays at the same time. Do we really buy this?

"Blayney shows that there is a low level of plays being entered in the
SR, except for two peaks in 1594-5 and 1600-1 (in each case 27 plays in
an 18 month period - against an annual 'background' of three).  Given
the number of plays entered in 1594-5, it is hardly surprising that
there appear to be lots of history plays.  In the circumstances, this
cannot be related to the number of plays performed or the number of
plays written.  What seems to have happened is that publishers thought
that there was money to be made from publishing plays."

All the best,

S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.

Subscribe to Our Feeds


Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.