The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1682  Tuesday, 23 July 2002

From:           Bob Rosen <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:           Monday, 22 Jul 2002 15:10:17 EDT
Subject:        Fact-event vs Pure-event

I recently attended a reception for a colleague at the University of
Oregon (UO) to celebrate her marriage. That was a fact-event. As we
entered the Alumni diningroom, we were handed a program. There was no
deviation from the script. The only unknown was the parking space I
would find.

If someone stood on the banks of the Willamette River, which also curls
past the UO, at that same moment with a fishing rod hoping to catch a
salmon, I would describe that scene as a pure-event. Compared to the
completely predictable doings at the reception, the fisherman had no
idea of the outcome of his venture.

Most of the events in our lives are fact-events. But the pivotal events
historians must interpret are pure-events. Even new technologies are
proven in pure-events.
Oddly enough, the dynamics of pure-events often transcend contingency.

I sometimes think, despite Shakespeare's intentions in Macbeth, that the
cauldron in which the witches threw those disagreeable ingredients had a
process of its own, which could have boiled up a fate for Macbeth that
could have been at variance with how the play ended. Which explains why
Macbeth was misled.

Bob Rosen

S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.

Subscribe to Our Feeds


Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.