The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.0528 Tuesday, 18 March 2003
Date: Monday, 17 Mar 2003 14:40:20 -0400
Subject: 14.0506 Re: Shaw on Actors' Accents
Comment: Re: SHK 14.0506 Re: Shaw on Actors' Accents
Michael Shurgot suggests that
>This whole "bit" about accents and high culture and King Lear is
>amusing, but at times seems irrelevant. Why would the Oregon Shakespeare
>Festival or Chicago Shakespeare Company or the NY Shakespeare Festival
>need high sounding British accents to convince their spectators to take
>seriously a production of Lear? Lear n'er spoke RP, now did he? Should
>we check the vocal patterns of patrons buying tickets at an American
>production of Lear just to be sure that they are sufficiently high class
>and "cultured" before they can enter the theatre? Since when is one's
>speaking patterns a sign of culture?
It isn't, of course, any more than subtitles are a sign of a good
movie. But subtitled films tend to be seen in different cinemas and
discussed a bit more earnestly than other films.
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.