The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.2383 Wednesday, 17 December 2003
From: Steve Roth <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 16 Dec 2003 23:14:33 -0800
Subject: 14.2373 Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist
Comment: Re: SHK 14.2373 Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist
Holger Schott:
>the fact that a publisher's ownership of a particular
>title, say, "King John," gave him certain rights over _any_ text
No, not rights "over" another text in the modern sense, but the right to
enjoin a competitive text's publication.
>Does this mean that Erne argues that _every_ play Shakespeare
>wrote before 1603 was either published or entered into the register?
No, that's not it. We're to the point of my having to reiterate his
arguments, which I can't do as well as his book can, nor do I choose to
stand here as his champion. So I'll let a representative sampling from
the book speak instead of me:
"King John was not printed until the First Folio in 1623, for
reasons that may have had nothing to do with reluctance on the
part of the Chamberlain's Men. The Troublesome Raigne of Iohn
King of England had been published in 1591 by Sampson Clarke, who
would no doubt have considered any edition of King John to which
he had not consented a breach of his rights. As Blayney explains,
"the owner of a copy had not only the exclusive right to reprint
the text, but also the right to a fair chance to recover his
costs. He could therefore seek the Company's protection if any
book -- not necessarily a reprint or plagiarism of his own copy
-- threatened his ability to dispose of unsold copies of an
existing edition." Troublesome Raigne was not reprinted until
1611, when, significantly, it was attributed to "W. Sh." When
Heminge and Condell wanted to include King John (and The Taming
of the Shrew) in the First Folio, they first had to obtain the
consent of the owners of The Troublesome Raigne (and The Taming
of a Shrew). The fact that King John was not printed until 1623
thus provides no evidence for the players' alleged reluctance to
have their plays printed."
Thanks,
Steve
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.