The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.1342 Wednesday, 2 July 2003
[1] From: R. A. Cantrell <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 01 Jul 2003 07:28:05 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
[2] From: Bob Grumman <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 08:49:54 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
[3] From: Clifford Stetner <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 09:43:09 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
[4] From: Don Bloom <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 08:51:29 -0500
Subj: RE: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
[5] From: Bruce Golden <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 10:03:07 EDT
Subj: Re: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
[6] From: Sally Drumm <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 01 Jul 2003 10:19:24 -0400
Subj: Re: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
[7] From: K. V. Sproat <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 10:40:24 EDT
Subj: Re: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
[8] From: Takashi Kozuka <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 01 Jul 2003 16:54:07 0000
Subj: Re: Deconstruction
[9] From: Martin Steward <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 20:49:16 +0100
Subj: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: R. A. Cantrell <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 01 Jul 2003 07:28:05 -0500
Subject: 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
Comment: Re: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
>There is no 'experience itself.'
Hold on there; please dilate upon this thing which is not, this
unextended name without being.
All the best,
R.A. Cantrell
<This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bob Grumman <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 08:49:54 -0400
Subject: 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
Comment: Re: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
>'I can express my experience of the world through my use of language.
>But the experience itself is handled other where.'
>
>There is no 'experience itself.'
>
>T. Hawkes
This seems quite insane to me. Are you saying my cat has no experiences
of existence? That my pain a few days ago when I once again walked into
a large oak branch while mowing my lawn was not an experience until I
said to myself, "Goddam, that hurt!?"
I think I may become a decondeconstructionist. My philosophy will be
that even worded events are not experience--unless the words used to
name them are High Poetry. That way we can not only shut animals out of
experiencing things but stupid people, too. (Funny, I keep thinking of
the way the Church defined souls a few hundred years ago--and possibly,
to an extent, the way they do now, for all I know.)
--Bob G.
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Clifford Stetner <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Tuesday, 1 Jul 2003 09:43:09 -0400
Subject: 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
Comment: Re: SHK 14.1335 Re: Deconstruction
Felperin, Howard. "The Dark Lady Identified: Or, what Deconstruction
can do for Shakespeare's Sonnets 56:
...is there any pre-modern text better suited to serve as a test case
for deconstruction? ... [The Sonnets] seem to have been cunningly
constructed, Shakespeare's prophetic soul dreaming on things to come,
with the idea of deconstruction in mind.
Fineman, J. Shakespeare's Perjured Eye: The Invention of Poetic
Subjectivity in the Sonnets. Berkeley: U of California P. 1986. 46:
...what Derrida calls "writing," the thematics of the deconstructive
"trace" that Derrida associates with
