The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0967 Tuesday, 31 October 2006
[1] From: Mario DiCesare <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 29 Oct 2006 18:11:33 -0500
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
[2] From: Nora Kreimer <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 29 Oct 2006 20:23:17 -0300
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
[3] From: Kristen McDermott <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 29 Oct 2006 18:55:14 -0500
Subj: RE: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
[4] From: Cary Dean Barney <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 30 Oct 2006 09:47:46 +0100
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
[5] From: John Drakakis <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 30 Oct 2006 09:46:34 -0000
Subj: RE: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
[6] From: John Ramsay <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 30 Oct 2006 12:41:58 -0000
Subj: Re: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mario DiCesare <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 29 Oct 2006 18:11:33 -0500
Subject: 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
>In "the Merchant of Venice", ... the poem in the silver casket
>states "marry who you will"........what's up with the discrepancy? Any
>suggestions ? I never noticed it before....
>
>Virginia Byrne
In II.ix, the "label" (referring to the picture of the blinking idiot)
reads in part:
Take what wife you will to bed,
I will ever be your head.
Most editors slide right by this; John Russell Brown (Arden) notes that
Dr. Johnson thought WS had obviously forgotten the condition never to "woo
a maid."
Mario A. Di Cesare
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Nora Kreimer <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 29 Oct 2006 20:23:17 -0300
Subject: 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Sigmund Freud, "The Theme of the Three Caskets"
[3]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kristen McDermott <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Sunday, 29 Oct 2006 18:55:14 -0500
Subject: 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Comment: RE: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Bravo to your student! Here's my purely subjective guess:
Perhaps this line is part of the overall curse/injunction to an
unsuccessful chooser: he must agree never to marry, but should he attempt
to renege, his marriage bed will be cursed with idiot progeny ("I will
ever be your head"). Which makes me wonder whether there's a nod to
Aragon's Juana the Mad, Philip II's great-aunt and Mary Tudor's aunt?
Kris McDermott
Central Michigan University
[4]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: Cary Dean Barney <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 30 Oct 2006 09:47:46 +0100
Subject: 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
I'm glad I'm not the only one whose students pick up on things their prof
misses...
Could it be that the mastermind behind the casket plot (Portia's father,
presumably) expects the losers to go back on their oath? After all they've
shown their character by chosing the wrong caskets. Also, with similar
logic, the implication may be that Arragon will take someone else's "wife
to bed", perhaps the natural consequence of not being able to marry
himself.
Love those loose ends.
[5]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Drakakis <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 30 Oct 2006 09:46:34 -0000
Subject: 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Comment: RE: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Interesting point, but the injunction to which Arragon agrees is that he
will "never in my life / To woo a maid in marriage" and that if he fails
he will "Immediately [to] leave you and begone. I take the emphasis on
the act of 'wooing' to be crucial here. The same thing happens with
Morocco earlier who is enjoined: "if you choose wrong, / Never to speak to
lady afterward / In way of marriage;" (2.1.40-2). Is not the emphasis here
upon 'romantic' courtship? Would this preclude a 'political' or arranged
marriage in which the man takes no active part in the way of courtship?
Elsewhere in Shakespeare there are more absolute embargoes on marriage for
failure to obey an injunction. I wonder to what extent the suitors to
Portia reflect the anxieties about marriage That involved Elizabeth
herself (esp. foreign 'political' marriages?) Just a thought
Cheers,
John Drakakis
[6]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Ramsay <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 30 Oct 2006 12:41:58 -0000
Subject: 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0953 MV Casket Choices
Actually Shakespeare wrote: ' Take what wife thou will to bed' .
Virginia must be working with a simplified or Bowdlerized version.
Either way, there is no discrepancy. Both expressions mean marry someone
else because you're not marrying me.
In modern English it is common enough to say: 'You can do what you want.'
But the implication is clear that you can do what you want with someone
else, not me.
John Ramsay
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions
expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor
assumes no responsibility for them.