The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0553 Monday, 12 June 2006
Date: Friday, 9 Jun 2006 06:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: 17.0544 Roast or Roost?
Comment: Re: SHK 17.0544 Roast or Roost?
>I have been trying to learn how editors know Shakespeare
>(and Hall, for that matter) meant "roast" instead of "roost?"
As the OED gives "rost" as a spelling variant of both "roost" and
"roast", it is impossible to know for certain which Shakespeare
intended. But as the OED cites "rule the roost" as a later variant of
"rule the roast" (OED 1b.: to rule the roost, now the more usual form of
to rule the roast, s.v. ROAST n. 1b.) with the first quotation dating
from 1769, it would seem "rule the roast" is the form contemporary to
Randle Cotgrave's 1611 dictionary also provides evidence that "rule the
roast" was the contemporary form: "To thinke well, or be well
conceited, of himselfe; to take too much, or very much, upon him; hence,
to presume on, or make himselfe sure of, a matter; to over-rule it,
dispose of it, prevaile in it, make it go on his side, or be for his
purpose; to commaund absolutely, or (as we say) to rule the roast; also,
to spread far in reputation; increase mightily in credit; get or grow
into great authoritie, by a thing" (Randle Cotgrave, "A dictionarie of
the French and English tongues", q.v. "S'en faire accroire").
- Stephanie Kydd
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.