The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0323  Tuesday, 8 May 2007

From: 		Cary DiPietro <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: 		Monday, 30 Apr 2007 11:19:56 -0400
Subject: 	SHAKSPER Roundtable Postmortem

In the final installment of the Presentism Roundtable, John Drakakis 

>"I was a little disappointed in that the round-table never quite got down
>to dealing with the conceptual framework of 'Presentism'... Nobody so far 
>I recall, raised the question of writing history, and of writing 
>kinds of history, or of dealing with the business of historiography and 
>protocols... I raise this, because unless and until we engage with this
>issue then 'Presentism' falls back into a domesticated version of the
>Derridean preoccupation with the future."

I'm not suggesting that I did a very good job there, but I did at least 
raise the issue of history as a narrative structure in one of the first of 
the Roundtable digests, precisely with a view to stimulating discussion 
about conceptual frameworks for Presentism:


The post was unnecessarily long, or perhaps it was the spectre of Jameson 
that scared him off. In any case, I would refer John to an article 
recently published in the journal _Shakespeare_ (3:1, March 2007) that 
offers a more cogent exploration of presentism and historical narrative 
precisely in this vein:


Shameless self-promotion, I know, but topical nonetheless...

Cary DiPietro

S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions 
expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor 
assumes no responsibility for them.

Subscribe to Our Feeds


Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.