The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0650  Tuesday, 18 November 2008

From:       Hardy M. Cook <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date:       Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Subject:    Jonathan Bate's _Soul of the Age_

The following review by Rene Weis appeared recently in the online version of The 
Independent <http://www.independent.co.uk/>:


November 14, 2008
Soul of the Age, By Jonathan Bate

Jonathan Bate sets out to write "an intellectual biography" of Shakespeare; or, 
as he puts it, to explore "Shakespeare's wit in the full 16th-century sense of 
the word". He loosely structures Soul of the Age around "the seven ages of man" 
speech by the melancholy Jaques in As You Like It. Nothing wrong with that: it 
has the merit of following Shakespeare's own potted view of the curve of human 
life. But Bate, to be true to his disdain for subjective expression in 
literature, ought to acknowledge that these lines, though written by 
Shakespeare, are spoken by a jaded cynic whose name means "privy".

[ . . . ]

Bate announces that "Gathering what we can from his plays and poems: that is how 
we will write a biography that is true to him". The truth will follow, nothing 
less. To this end, he instructs us, we need subtly to "triangulate" the life, 
work and world, and search for "traces of cultural DNA", or else run the 
gauntlet of the "immense perils" of literalism. To firm up this rebranded New 
Criticism, Bate approvingly cites an Oxford academic; never mind that Goethe, 
Wordsworth and Keats might take a different view.

A mere 47 pages later, however, Bate is shifting his ground. "We must always be 
wary", he warns again, "of attempts to map Shakespeare's life on to his work. 
But writers cannot avoid drawing on their experience". Some "but"! Bate now 
finds himself arguing that Shakespeare's portrayal of doctors after King Lear 
was inspired by the arrival of Dr John Hall, who in 1607 married Susanna 
Shakespeare. Later, Bate concedes further points of intersection between 
Shakespeare's life and art in Macbeth. The Porter's speech directly alludes to 
the real-life trial and execution in 1606 of Father Henry Garnett. Much the same 
applies to the use of Gower in Pericles, to the cross-gender twins in Twelfth 
Night, and to much else - including Shakespeare's reference to his friend and 
publisher Richard Field in Cymbeline.

An early chapter is given over entirely to The Tempest, one of three discrete 
discussions of Shakespeare's last solo play. According to Bate, it "asks a 
central humanist question: what do we have to learn from books?" The play 
features here only because of its links with books, just when Bate is trying to 
extrapolate Shakespeare's surmised library from his education at the Stratford 
grammar school. His pages on Shakespeare's schooling are generally well done, 
though quite dense. Bate the professor gets stuck into Shakespeare's sources 
while elsewhere warning his readers against recreating Shakespeare in their own 
image. His Shakespeare belongs to the world of intellectual literary history. 
For Bate, Shakespeare's plays are tame, Anglican creatures. Characteristically, 
he sees a fairy-tale Ovid everywhere in A Midsummer Night's Dream when 
Shakespeare here owes far more to Apuleius' brilliantly kinky The Golden Ass, as 
Frank Kermode showed long ago.

[ . . . ]

S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions 
expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no 
responsibility for them.

Subscribe to Our Feeds


Make a Gift to SHAKSPER

Consider making a gift to support SHAKSPER.