The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 20.0402 Friday, 24 July 2009
From: Eric Johnson-DeBaufre <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Thursday, 23 Jul 2009 19:53:19 -0400
Subject: 20.0395 Updating Shakespeare's Plays
Comment: Re: SHK 20.0395 Updating Shakespeare's Plays
Julie Sutherland wrote:
>I absolutely agree that there have been some abominable
>'updatings' of Shakespeare, and equally abominable
>performances by women in Shakespeare. The worst productions
>I have seen, however, have been 'true' to the text and
>context (acknowledging our limited understanding of that
>context, unless we want to challenge the inerrancy of
>Hamlet in *Hamlet*, but we all know where believing in
>the inerrancy of anything gets us).
My whole post was heavily ironic, something I hoped was clear from the
"I blame the Bard himself" comment that I appended to the end. Granted
that one can always produce examples of "updatings" that are not
successful, but I prefer that to productions that take no risks at all.
Shakespeare's audiences presumably did not find it strange to watch
dramas about ancient Romans performed by cross-dressing men dressed in
Elizabethan clothing, but for some reason some scholars find it terribly
distracting or annoying to watch performances of King Lear in which the
setting evokes Sarajevo. I can understand responses that object to
particular updatings by detailing what was unsuccessful about them, but
not those that wish the practice would disappear altogether. What would
be the alternative?
Cheers,
Eric Johnson-DeBaufre
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.