The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 24.0543 Tuesday, 3 December 2013
Date: December 3, 2013 at 10:23:57 AM EST
Subject: Harry Berger
Michael Egan wrote,
>It is not often in these columns that I hear a public supporting
>voice. Thanks to Gerald Downs for agreeing that the citation
>is virtually meaningless. I’d like to push the matter one step
>further: how did we get to this place in Shakespeare criticism
>where not only does such baloney get written and published
>but no one notices and even worse no one cares.
>The oh-so-bored Harry Berger, for example
Just curious: is it that bored Berger actually writes baloney or just doesn’t care properly when others do?