The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 9.1265 Tuesday, 8 December 1998.
[1] From: Sean Lawrence <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 07 Dec 1998 17:46:07 -0800
Subj: Re: SHK 9.1254 Re: Branagh's LLL PLUS
[2] From: N. R. Moschovakis <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 7 Dec 1998 19:56:16 -0600
Subj: Re: SHK 9.1254 Re: Branagh's LLL PLUS
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sean Lawrence <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 07 Dec 1998 17:46:07 -0800
Subject: 9.1254 Re: Branagh's LLL PLUS
Comment: Re: SHK 9.1254 Re: Branagh's LLL PLUS
I wrote:
> Thanks for posting this. Perhaps I just think this because they have a
> 3D theatre here in Vancouver, but does this mean that the film will be
> made in 3D for ultra-huge screens?
Blushingly, I have to admit that I mixed up Miramax with Omnimax, as
David Kathman kindly pointed out off-line.
Cheers,
Sean.
[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From: N. R. Moschovakis <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Date: Monday, 7 Dec 1998 19:56:16 -0600
Subject: 9.1254 Re: Branagh's LLL PLUS
Comment: Re: SHK 9.1254 Re: Branagh's LLL PLUS
Brad Berens asks (apropos the call I got from someone working on
Branagh's LLL):
>What was the pronunciation question?
It was about the name which appears in the 1598 quarto as "Longauill" -
I have no idea what the British stage pronunciation of this might be,
having seen only U.S. actors in the play.
